Six Quality Grades
low, medium, high, xhigh, max, and auto. The top two grades are new in 2.5.
OpenAI's ChatGPT Images 2.5 arrives in Virse as both API editions, GPT Image 2.5 Flare and GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, with six quality grades and output up to 4K.
Abra esta página em um navegador de desktop para começar a criar.
ChatGPT Images 2.5 shipped on 8 September 2026 as two models rather than one, and the difference between them is time.
GPT Image 2.5 Flare is the fast one, which OpenAI describes as the default choice for most applications. GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst takes longer per image and is built for work where editing precision matters most. On most platforms that choice is also a budget choice, and the precise edition quietly becomes the one you save for the final render.
In Virse the two sit in the same model menu and cost the same number of credits at every quality grade, all the way from 1K Low to 4K Max. Draft on Flare because it comes back sooner, move to Sunburst when the picture has to survive a close look, and let the job decide rather than the invoice.

ChatGPT Images 2.5 is OpenAI's image model released on 8 September 2026, available to all ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex users across all tiers on desktop, mobile, and web. OpenAI summarises the release as sharper details, more precise editing, and faster generation.
The name works on two levels. ChatGPT Images 2.5 is the product name inside ChatGPT. In the API, and in Virse, the same generation appears as two models: gpt-image-2.5-flare and gpt-image-2.5-sunburst, both carrying a 2026-09-08 snapshot date.
OpenAI names three improvements over the previous generation:
Alongside the model, OpenAI introduced Sketch, templates, comment-based edits, and prompt sharing. Those four are ChatGPT interface features rather than model parameters, and they are not what Virse exposes. What Virse exposes is the model itself, at the quality grades, sizes, and reference-image behaviour described in OpenAI's own documentation.
This page is for people deciding whether to move production image work onto 2.5, and which of the two editions to point it at.

low, medium, high, xhigh, max, and auto. The top two grades are new in 2.5.
Total pixel count runs from 655,360 to 8,294,400, with no single edge above 3840 pixels.
Any WIDTHxHEIGHT with both edges a multiple of 16 and an aspect ratio between 1:3 and 3:1.
Written briefs and reference images both go in. The output is always an image.
Set background to transparent and take the result as PNG or WebP, with no matte pass.
gpt-image-2.5-flare and gpt-image-2.5-sunburst, both snapshot-dated 2026-09-08.

OpenAI built 2.5 to work harder from reference photos, carrying distinctive features through when a subject moves to a new setting, style, or composition. The same face, the same bottle, the same room, somewhere else.

Ask for one change and the rest of the frame is more likely to stay put. OpenAI describes the model as better at editing only what you asked for while keeping the surrounding detail the same, including on complex subjects and backgrounds.

Long edit sessions used to degrade. OpenAI says earlier changes now hold as new ones arrive, so the tenth revision still carries the first nine rather than quietly undoing them.

The model reads complex visual instructions more accurately and reflects a described visual style more closely, which shows up most in surfaces: fabric, skin, metal, and anything lit from a direction you specified.

Dense arrangements hold their hierarchy, and transparent backgrounds are handled as part of the layout rather than as an afterthought. Cut-out assets come out ready to place.

OpenAI reports image generation latency reduced by up to 50% against Images 2.0. Flare carries that gain; Sunburst trades it back for precision.
Both 2.5 editions take the same parameters and cost the same credits in Virse. What separates them is how long each image takes.
| Dimensão | GPT Image 2.5 Flare | GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst | GPT Image 2 | Fonte |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI's description | "Fast, high-quality everyday image generation" | "Our most capable model for image generation and editing" | The previous generation, still selectable in Virse | Fonte |
| Built for | The default choice for most work, from social content to high-volume runs | Premium visual work that benefits from tighter control across edits | Long multi-constraint briefs | Fonte |
| Quality grades | Six, up to max | Six, up to max | Three, up to high | Fonte |
| Speed | Up to 50% lower latency than Images 2.0 | Longer generation times, traded for precision | Baseline | Fonte |
| Credits at 2K High in Virse | 18 | 18 | 36 | Fonte |
| Credits at 2K Max in Virse | 69 | 69 | Grade not available | Fonte |
Reference-led work is rarely one prompt. It is a photo, a brand rule, four attempts, and a note from someone else about the third one. Virse keeps all of it on one canvas. The reference you generated from, the brief you wrote, and every version that came back stay side by side, so comparing a result against its source is a glance rather than a file hunt.
Park the source photo on the canvas beside the generations it produced, and judge subject fidelity by looking at both at once.

Settle the composition on the fast edition, then re-run the agreed brief on Sunburst. The credit cost per image is the same at every grade, so only the wait changes.

Move between ChatGPT Images 2.5 and 30+ other image and video models without leaving the canvas or rewriting the brief.

Each revision lands beside the one before it, so a ten-turn edit session stays readable and you can go back to turn four without regenerating it.


Series work where every asset has to carry the same visual direction, hierarchy, and treatment.

A single product photograph placed into as many settings, seasons, and surfaces as the campaign needs.

Front-of-pack layouts carrying exact product names, descriptors, and legally required copy.

Transparent-background elements for decks, banners, and layouts that need no matte pass afterwards.

Process graphics and cross-sections where the labels have to be correct rather than decorative.

Photographs of real people and places moved into new settings while the subject stays recognisable.
Select the model from the menu. Start on Flare while the picture is still being decided, since it returns sooner at the same credit cost.
Upload the photos and name each one by purpose: this one is the subject, this one is the style, this one is the background. Say how they should combine.
Describe the result and its intended use, then list what must not change and what must not appear. Put any on-image words in quotes.
Send the output back as the input for the next edit, ask for a single change, and repeat the details you want preserved.
OpenAI's own prompting guide for 2.5 builds a prompt from six parts, in this order. Writing the constraints down once is what lets you restate them when a later edit drifts.
Em vez de escrever
Make a nice product photo of the bottle on a nice background, professional looking.
Escreva
A product photograph for an e-commerce listing, square, the bottle centred and filling the middle 70 percent of the frame. Amber glass, brushed aluminium cap, condensation on the lower third. Matte sand-coloured paper backdrop, one soft light from the upper left, a single soft shadow falling to the right. The front label reads "NORTH FIELD" in small caps across the upper third and "500 ml" at the lower edge. Reference 1 is the bottle and its label artwork; keep the label geometry and typography exactly as supplied. No extra text, no logos, no watermark.

A photograph of the ceramic vase from Reference 1, moved to a sunlit windowsill in a plastered white room, shot straight on from two metres back at eye level. Late afternoon light entering from the right at a low angle, throwing the window frame's shadow across the wall behind. Keep the vase's glaze colour, the crackle pattern, and the proportions of the neck exactly as they appear in the reference. Change only the setting and the light. No extra objects on the sill. No text, no logos, no watermark.

A flat-lay poster for a neighbourhood bakery, portrait orientation, photographed from directly above on a dark walnut table. Across the top third, the words "FIELD AND FLOUR" set in a wide serif, letter-spaced, in cream. Beneath it, "Open from six" in a small italic at a third of the size. At the bottom edge, "No. 41 Bridge Street" in small caps. A torn sourdough loaf at the lower left, a linen cloth folded twice at the right, flour dusted unevenly across the lower quarter. One overhead light slightly behind the subject, long soft shadows towards the camera. No other text anywhere in the frame.

A single pair of running shoes, three-quarter view from the front left, laid flat with the left shoe slightly overlapping the right. Mesh upper in bright coral with a white midsole and a translucent amber outsole. Laces tied, tongue standing upright, no creasing at the toe box. Even diffuse light from directly above, no cast shadow, edges clean and complete including the laces. Transparent background. No surface beneath the shoes, no text, no logos, no watermark.
Number them and say what each one is for. An unexplained reference gets averaged into the result instead of being used for the one thing you wanted from it.
Name the geometry, the labels, the lighting, and the identity that must survive. Then ask for the change. Doing it in that order is what keeps edits local.
Unwanted text, logos, and watermarks are worth excluding explicitly. So is a second light source you never asked for.
The quality grade changes rendering, not what the picture contains. Deciding the content at low and raising the grade afterwards keeps those two questions separate.
Upload the photo, write what changes and what does not, and take the result up a grade once the picture is agreed.